N432CV

No registry detail on file · not in current registry

Operators of this aircraft

Who operated this tail, and how firmly we know it.

OperatorRolePeriodBasis
QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INC (Q5QA)Certificate holderMatched by certificate designator

Accident & incident history

No NTSB accidents or incidents on file for this aircraft.

Maintenance disclosures

J · 2020-01-27 Matched by certificate designator
ATA 2497

PILOT NOTED AFTER ENGINE START THAT GENERATOR 2 WAS TRIPPED OFF LINE. THE PILOT MEL'D GENERATOR 2 AND RETURNED TO HOME BASE. A TECHNICIAN NOTED UPON AN INSPECTION OF GENERATOR 2 THAT THE RING TERMINAL ATTACHED TO THE GENERATOR OUTPUT POST (B+) WAS SEVERELY HEAT DAMAGE DUE TO HIGH RESISTANCE. THE TECHNICIAN REPLACED THE RING TERMINAL AND, AS A PRECAUTION, REPLACED THE GENERATOR 2. NO FURTHER ACTION WAS REQUIRED. GENERATOR 2 OPERATIONAL CHECK WAS SATISFACTORY.

Source: SDR Q5QA2020012701 · FAA SDRS
J · 2016-12-03 Matched by certificate designator
ATA 2751

PILOT REPORTED A FLAPS FAILED INDICATION. INVESTIGATION DISCLOSED THE RT FLAP POSITION TRANSMITTER WAS FAULTY. INSTALLED A NEW TRANSMITTER. SUBSEQUENT FLAP OPERATIONAL CHECKS WERE SATISFACTORY. NO FURTHER ACTION WAS REQUIRED.

Source: SDR Q5QA2017011607 · FAA SDRS
B · 2015-07-06 Matched by certificate designator
ATA 3100

PILOT REPORTED SMOKE IN THE CABIN/COCKPIT FROM THE COPILOTS EADI. PART TOTAL TIME IS UNKNOWN, PROPELLER TOTAL CYCLES ARE UNKNOWN.

Source: SDR 2015F00080 · FAA SDRS
O · 2009-11-10 Unresolved
ATA 5210

IN CRUISE FLIGHT AT FL200, IMC, THE PILOT’S WINDSCREEN CRACKED WITH A LOUD BANG. PIC PREFORMED AN EMERGENCY DESCENT AND CHOSE TO DIVERT, 10 MILES IN FRONT OF US. COORDINATED WITH ATC, DECLARED AN EMERGENCY, SET UP ILS, GOT ATIS, ETC. ALSO DE-PRESSURIZED THE ACFT USING THE MANUAL CONTROL VALVE DURING THE DESCENT. PIC PERFORMED THE ILS 13 AT DSM, TOOK OVER CONTROLS AND LANDED FROM THE RT SEAT DUE TO REDUCED VISIBILITY FROM THE LT SEAT. THERE WERE NO CHECKLIST ITEMS ON THE QRH FOR A CRACKED WINDSCREEN SO WE USED OUR BEST JUDGMENT IN DESCENDING, DEPRESSURIZING, AND LANDING ASAP. ALSO DEEMED IT PRUDENT TO DUCK BEHIND THE PANEL IN CASE THE WINDSCREEN WAS TO SHATTER INWARD. AFTER LANDING, THE OUTER LAYER WAS DISCOVERED TO BE CRACKED, THE INNER LAYER WAS INTACT. SOME SORT OF GOGGLES OR EYE/FACE PROTECTION SHOULD BE INCLUDED FOR THE PILOTS IN THE EVENT THIS WAS TO REOCCUR. MECHANICS COMMENT: UPON EXAMINATION OF THE REMOVED WINDSHIELD, IT APPEARS THE GLASS SHATTERED FROM ONE ORIGINAL STRESS RISER, MOST LIKELY DAMAGE RECEIVED FROM A STONE CHIP OR SOMETHING SIMILAR. IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THAT THE WINDSHIELD WAS REMOVED IN ONE PIECE WITH THE INNER PLY MAINTAINING THE INTEGRITY OF THE GLASS. ALTHOUGH THE PILOT REPORTED A CRACKED WINDSHIELD, IT ACTUALLY SHATTERED TO THE POINT OF BEING COMPLETELY OPAQUE.

Source: SDR 2009FA0000954 · FAA SDRS