N812LV

EUROCOPTER DEUTSCHLAND GMBH EC 135 P2+ · 2007 · Rotorcraft · 2 engines · 7 seats · Valid Registration

Registered owner: AIR METHODS LLC, CO (owner ≠ operator)

Operators of this aircraft

Who operated this tail, and how firmly we know it.

OperatorRolePeriodBasis
Air Methods Corp. (QMLA)Certificate holderMatched by certificate designator

Accident & incident history

No NTSB accidents or incidents on file for this aircraft.

Maintenance disclosures

Service Difficulty Reports filed with the FAA for this airframe. Filing is largely voluntary — the number of reports is not a measure of reliability. To verify a report, search its control number at the FAA SDRS site.

2 reports on file, 2011-02-12 – 2011-02-18.

WARNING INDICATION · 2011-02-18 Matched by certificate designator
ATA 2497

Part: WIRE — CHAFED · airframe 924 hrs

PILOT EXPERIENCED AN IN FLT FADEC FAILURE/ENGINE MANUAL INDICATION. PILOT PERFORMED EMERGENCY PROCEDURES. ON GROUND AND SHUTDOWN, POWER WAS RE-APPLIED TO SYS & NO FAULTS INDICATED. PERFORMED DIAGNOSTICS WITH MANUFACTURER SOFTWARE. DOWNLOADED DATA FROM DCU & FOUND FAULT CODE "CFUR 1=5" FOR MODE. PERFORMED TROUBLESHOOTING IAW MM 72-00-02 ON EEC CONNECTOR P1, PINS X & Y WITH NO FAULTS FOUND. LOWERED/OPENED OVERHEAD PANEL TO INSPECT THE WIRING OF THE MODE SELECT SWITCH & FOUND A WIRE CHAFED TO NR 1 ENGINE MODE SELECT SWITCH 103KA. REPAIRED CHAFED WIRE. ALSO REPOSITIONED BUNDLE TO PROVIDE SEPARATION FROM ROTOR BRAKE CABLE THAT WAS PERCEIVED ISSUE WITH CHAFING. SYSTEM TESTED GOOD & ACFT RETURNED TO SERVICE.

Source: SDR QMLA2011021811027
FLT CONT AFFECTED · 2011-02-12 Matched by certificate designator
ATA 7320

Part: FADEC — FALSE INDICATION (NR 1 ENGINE) · airframe 919 hrs · 2,174 cycles

THE PILOT HAD JUST DEPARTED A SCENE WITH A PATIENT ON BOARD WHEN THE HELICOPTER EXPERIENCED A FAILURE OF THE NR1 ENGINE FADEC SYS. THE PILOT IMMEDIATELY TURNED THE ACFT AROUND, AND BEGAN HEADING TOWARDS THE CLOSEST AIRPORT WITH EMERGENCY FACILITIES. THE PILOT FOLLOWED THE EMERGENCY PROCEDURES FOR LANDING. ONCE ON THE GROUND, THE PATIENT WAS TRANSPORTED TO THE HOSPITAL BY ANOTHER ACFT. THE MECHANIC WAS CALLED TO THE LOCATION TO TROUBLESHOOT THE FAILURE. THE SYS APPARENTLY HAD RESET ITSELF UPON LANDING. THE MECHANIC INSPECTED THE ACFT AND COULD NOT DUPLICATE THE PROBLEM. THE ACFT WAS RETURNED TO SERVICE.

Source: SDR QMLA2011021211025